About the Peer Review Process

The Conference follows internationally recognized ethical standards for peer review. To guarantee objectivity, we prioritize independent reviewers—those who are not co-authors, collaborators, or affiliated with the same institution as the paper’s authors. 

Double-blind peer review: Each paper must be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers who possess subject matter expertise relevant to the conference scope. Both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the process. 

Reviewers: Reviewers include Committee members and external experts holding academic degrees (PhD or Doctor of Sciences) with demonstrated experience in the relevant field. The full list of reviewers is published on the Committee webpage. 

Plagiarism check: Before the review process, all submitted paper are checked to ensure originality. 

Review Timeline: The peer review process is conducted within a set time frame. Authors are notified of the review decision on their paper.  

Reviewer Responsibilities 

Reviewers are expected to provide a concise and constructive evaluation of each submitted paper, including a summary of the research goals and key findings, balanced feedback that highlights both strengths and areas for improvement, and clear suggestions to enhance the clarity, structure, and overall academic quality of the paper. 

Reviewers assess submissions based on the following criteria: 

Scope: Is the paper appropriate for the scope of this conference? 

Novelty: Is this original material distinct from previous publications? 

Validity: Is the study well designed and executed? 

Data: Are the data reported, analyzed, and interpreted correctly? 

Clarity: Are the ideas expressed clearly, concisely, and logically? 

Compliance: Are all ethical and publication requirements met? 

Advancement: Is this a significant contribution to the field? 

Final Decision 

Reviewers recommend one of the following decisions: 

Accept: The paper is accepted without any edits. 

Accept with revision: The paper is accepted pending minor or moderate revisions as suggested by reviewers. 

Reject: The paper is declined for presentation and publication, with a clear explanation provided to the authors. 

How to Become a Reviewer 

Qualified experts interested in joining the review panel are welcome to apply. Requirements include an academic degree and relevant field experience. To apply: 

1. Submit a request to the Conference Committee Chair. 

2. Provide your specialization, contact details, and preferences. 

3. Approved reviewers receive guidelines and access to submissions.